「排期」修訂間的差異

出自EBGreenCard
跳至導覽 跳至搜尋
行 19: 行 19:
 
|7/20
 
|7/20
 
|[[7/20排期讨论]]
 
|[[7/20排期讨论]]
|
+
|[[7/20奥本语录]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|6/20
 
|6/20
行 58: 行 58:
 
|}
 
|}
  
= 国会报告 =
+
= [[7/20奥本语录| ]] 会报告 =
 
[https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46291 The Employment-Based Immigration Backlog] 
 
[https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46291 The Employment-Based Immigration Backlog] 
  
 
Maintaining the 7% per-country ceiling, by contrast would '''substantially''' '''increase''' the already long wait times for Indian and Chinese nationals, but it would continue to allow those from elsewhere to receive green cards relatively quickly.
 
Maintaining the 7% per-country ceiling, by contrast would '''substantially''' '''increase''' the already long wait times for Indian and Chinese nationals, but it would continue to allow those from elsewhere to receive green cards relatively quickly.

於 2020年6月19日 (五) 02:01 的修訂

2020財年
月份 排期討論 奧本 Check-In
10/20
9/20
8/20
7/20 7/20排期討論 7/20奧本語錄
6/20 6/20排期討論 6/20奧本語錄
5/20
4/20
3/20
2/20
1/20
12/19
11/19
10/19

會報告

The Employment-Based Immigration Backlog

Maintaining the 7% per-country ceiling, by contrast would substantially increase the already long wait times for Indian and Chinese nationals, but it would continue to allow those from elsewhere to receive green cards relatively quickly.