“排期”的版本间的差异
跳到导航
跳到搜索
| 第19行： | 第19行： | ||
|7/20 | |7/20 | ||
|[[7/20排期讨论]] | |[[7/20排期讨论]] | ||
| − | | | + | |[[7/20奥本语录]] |
|- | |- | ||
|6/20 | |6/20 | ||
| 第58行： | 第58行： | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | = | + | = [[7/20奥本语录| 国]] 会报告 = |
[https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46291 The Employment-Based Immigration Backlog] | [https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46291 The Employment-Based Immigration Backlog] | ||
Maintaining the 7% per-country ceiling, by contrast would '''substantially''' '''increase''' the already long wait times for Indian and Chinese nationals, but it would continue to allow those from elsewhere to receive green cards relatively quickly. | Maintaining the 7% per-country ceiling, by contrast would '''substantially''' '''increase''' the already long wait times for Indian and Chinese nationals, but it would continue to allow those from elsewhere to receive green cards relatively quickly. | ||
2020年6月19日 (五) 02:01的版本
| 月份 | 排期讨论 | 奥本 Check-In |
|---|---|---|
| 10/20 | ||
| 9/20 | ||
| 8/20 | ||
| 7/20 | 7/20排期讨论 | 7/20奥本语录 |
| 6/20 | 6/20排期讨论 | 6/20奥本语录 |
| 5/20 | ||
| 4/20 | ||
| 3/20 | ||
| 2/20 | ||
| 1/20 | ||
| 12/19 | ||
| 11/19 | ||
| 10/19 |
国会报告
The Employment-Based Immigration Backlog
Maintaining the 7% per-country ceiling, by contrast would substantially increase the already long wait times for Indian and Chinese nationals, but it would continue to allow those from elsewhere to receive green cards relatively quickly.
