6/20奥本语录 - 版本历史

Yike Gao：/* General Observations: */

2020-06-01T01:20:58Z

General Observations:

2020年6月1日 (一) 01:20 Yike Gao

2020-06-01T01:20:05Z

2020年6月1日 (一) 01:18 Yike Gao

2020-06-01T01:18:29Z

2020年6月1日 (一) 01:17 Yike Gao

2020-06-01T01:17:08Z

2020年6月1日 (一) 01:15 Yike Gao

2020-06-01T01:15:19Z

2020年6月1日 (一) 01:14 Yike Gao

2020-06-01T01:14:05Z

Yike Gao：创建页面，内容为“General Observations: As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks access to certain government databases, he is unable to provide pr…”

2020-06-01T01:12:34Z

创建页面，内容为“General Observations: As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks access to certain government databases, he is unable to provide pr…”

新页面

General Observations:

As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks

access to certain government databases, he is unable to provide projections

beyond what is included herein.

As might be expected, immigrant visa (IV) usage was lower than normal in

April 2020 due to the closure of U.S. consulates and USCIS offices.

Notwithstanding these closures, Charlie was pleased to see that

employment-based number usage was respectable in April given the current

situation, and that there has already been decent sized number usage thus

far in May.

Movements in the final action dates and the redistribution of otherwise

unused visa numbers have traditionally been influenced by the demand for

visa numbers in the various categories relative to the annual visa limits.

During the COVID-19 global pandemic, the lack of government capacity to

process applications is proving to be a significant factor in how visa

numbers can be allocated in an effort to maximize fiscal year number usage

consistent with the INA.

Charlie must now take into account the agencies’ capacity to process

applications, in addition to supply and demand, in determining final action

date movements.

Lack of significant EB-1 Worldwide demand, and the existence of a

significant amount of pre-adjudicated demand in EB-1 India makes it possible

for more rapid advancement for EB-1 India.

In contrast, before the COVID-19 pandemic, Charlie warned of high levels of

EB-2 Worldwide demand, which he expected would result in the imposition of a

final action date in that category in the summer.

Although that is no longer likely, the existence of significant worldwide

demand may make it far less likely that the pre-adjudicated demand in EB-2

India can be acted upon.

Where possible, Charlie is doing his best to work with pre-adjudicated

demand to facilitate number usage and is heartened by USCIS’s efforts to

approve employment-based adjustment of status applications.

Nevertheless, he thinks it is unlikely that the employment-based limit will

be reached in FY2020. He noted that he will have a better sense of whether

the limit will be reached after he analyzes the June 2020 data.

Employment-based Preference Categories

EB-1 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico

Philippines and Vietnam) which became current in May 2020 remains current in

June. Given the lack of EB-1 demand and the likelihood of otherwise unused

numbers becoming available from the EB-5 category, this category is expected

to remain current through the end of FY2020.

In June the final action date for EB-1 China will advance one month from

July 15, 2017, to August 15, 2017. EB-1 India will take a significant leap

of over ten months from August 1, 2015, to June 8, 2016.

EB-2 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico

Philippines and Vietnam) remains current in June, with EB-2 China again

advancing at the pace of one month from October 1, 2015, to November 1, 2015

. EB-2 India advances 10 days in June from June 2, 2009, to June 12, 2009.

@@ 第1行： / 第1行： @@
-=== General Observations: ===
+== General Observations: ==
 As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks access to certain government databases, he is unable to provide projections beyond what is included herein.As might be expected, immigrant visa (IV) usage was lower than normal in April 2020 due to the closure of U.S. consulates and USCIS offices. Not withstanding these closures, Charlie was pleased to see that employment-based number usage was respectable in April given the current situation, and that there has already been decent sized number usage thus far in May. Movements in the final action dates and the redistribution of otherwise unused visa numbers have traditionally been influenced by the demand for visa numbers in the various categories relative to the annual visa limits. During the COVID-19 global pandemic, the lack of government capacity to process applications is proving to be a significant factor in how visa numbers can be allocated in an effort to maximize fiscal year number usage consistent with the INA. Charlie must now take into account the agencies’ capacity to process applications, in addition to supply and demand, in determining final action date movements. Lack of significant EB-1 Worldwide demand, and the existence of a significant amount of pre-adjudicated demand in EB-1 India makes it possible for more rapid advancement for EB-1 India. In contrast, before the COVID-19 pandemic, Charlie warned of high levels of EB-2 Worldwide demand, which he expected would result in the imposition of a final action date in that category in the summer. Although that is no longer likely, the existence of significant worldwide demand may make it far less likely that the pre-adjudicated demand in EB-2 India can be acted upon. Where possible, Charlie is doing his best to work with pre-adjudicated demand to facilitate number usage and is heartened by USCIS’s efforts to approve employment-based adjustment of status applications. Nevertheless, the thinks it is unlikely that the employment-based limit will be reached in FY2020. He noted that he will have a better sense of whether the limit will be reached after he analyzes the June 2020 data.
-=== Employment-based Preference Categories ===
+== Employment-based Preference Categories ==
 EB-1 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico Philippines and Vietnam) which became current in May 2020 remains current in June. Given the lack of EB-1 demand and the likelihood of otherwise unused numbers becoming available from the EB-5 category, this category is expected to remain current through the end of FY2020. In June the final action date for EB-1 China will advance one month from July 15, 2017, to August 15, 2017. EB-1 India will take a significant leap of over ten months from August 1, 2015, to June 8, 2016. EB-2 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico Philippines and Vietnam) remains current in June, with EB-2 China again advancing at the pace of one month from October 1, 2015, to November 1, 2015. EB-2 India advances 10 days in June from June 2, 2009, to June 12, 2009.

@@ 第1行： / 第1行： @@
 === General Observations: ===
-As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks access to certain government databases, he is unable to provide projections beyond what is included herein.As might be expected, immigrant visa (IV) usage was lower than normal in April 2020 due to the closure of U.S. consulates and USCIS offices. Not withstanding these closures, Charlie was pleased to see that employment-based number usage was respectable in April given the current situation, and that there has already been decent sized number usage thus far in May. Movements in the final action dates and the redistribution of otherwise unused visa numbers have traditionally been influenced by the demand for visa numbers in the various categories relative to the annual visa limits. During the COVID-19 global pandemic, the lack of government capacity to process applications is proving to be a significant factor in how visa numbers can be allocated in an effort to maximize fiscal year number usage consistent with the INA. Charlie must now take into account the agencies’ capacity to process applications, in addition to supply and demand, in determining final action date movements.
+As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks access to certain government databases, he is unable to provide projections beyond what is included herein.As might be expected, immigrant visa (IV) usage was lower than normal in April 2020 due to the closure of U.S. consulates and USCIS offices. Not withstanding these closures, Charlie was pleased to see that employment-based number usage was respectable in April given the current situation, and that there has already been decent sized number usage thus far in May. Movements in the final action dates and the redistribution of otherwise unused visa numbers have traditionally been influenced by the demand for visa numbers in the various categories relative to the annual visa limits. During the COVID-19 global pandemic, the lack of government capacity to process applications is proving to be a significant factor in how visa numbers can be allocated in an effort to maximize fiscal year number usage consistent with the INA. Charlie must now take into account the agencies’ capacity to process applications, in addition to supply and demand, in determining final action date movements. Lack of significant EB-1 Worldwide demand, and the existence of a significant amount of pre-adjudicated demand in EB-1 India makes it possible for more rapid advancement for EB-1 India. In contrast, before the COVID-19 pandemic, Charlie warned of high levels of EB-2 Worldwide demand, which he expected would result in the imposition of a final action date in that category in the summer. Although that is no longer likely, the existence of significant worldwide demand may make it far less likely that the pre-adjudicated demand in EB-2 India can be acted upon. Where possible, Charlie is doing his best to work with pre-adjudicated demand to facilitate number usage and is heartened by USCIS’s efforts to approve employment-based adjustment of status applications. Nevertheless, the thinks it is unlikely that the employment-based limit will be reached in FY2020. He noted that he will have a better sense of whether the limit will be reached after he analyzes the June 2020 data.
 === Employment-based Preference Categories ===
-EB-1 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico
+EB-1 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico Philippines and Vietnam) which became current in May 2020 remains current in June. Given the lack of EB-1 demand and the likelihood of otherwise unused numbers becoming available from the EB-5 category, this category is expected to remain current through the end of FY2020. In June the final action date for EB-1 China will advance one month from July 15, 2017, to August 15, 2017. EB-1 India will take a significant leap of over ten months from August 1, 2015, to June 8, 2016. EB-2 Worldwide (including El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico Philippines and Vietnam) remains current in June, with EB-2 China again advancing at the pace of one month from October 1, 2015, to November 1, 2015. EB-2 India advances 10 days in June from June 2, 2009, to June 12, 2009.

@@ 第1行： / 第1行： @@
 === General Observations: ===
-As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks
+As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks access to certain government databases, he is unable to provide projections beyond what is included herein.As might be expected, immigrant visa (IV) usage was lower than normal in April 2020 due to the closure of U.S. consulates and USCIS offices. Not withstanding these closures, Charlie was pleased to see that employment-based number usage was respectable in April given the current situation, and that there has already been decent sized number usage thus far in May. Movements in the final action dates and the redistribution of otherwise unused visa numbers have traditionally been influenced by the demand for visa numbers in the various categories relative to the annual visa limits. During the COVID-19 global pandemic, the lack of government capacity to process applications is proving to be a significant factor in how visa numbers can be allocated in an effort to maximize fiscal year number usage consistent with the INA. Charlie must now take into account the agencies’ capacity to process applications, in addition to supply and demand, in determining final action date movements.
 Lack of significant EB-1 Worldwide demand, and the existence of a

←上一版本		2020年6月1日 (一) 01:14的版本
第1行：		第1行：
−	General Observations:	+	General Observations:

	As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks		As noted last month, while Charlie is required to work from home and lacks